Differences between new United States recommendations and existing European guidelines on the use of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) following non-occupational exposure

Last week the United States Department of Health and Human Services published updated recommendations for the use of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) following non-occupational exposure to HIV. The evidence is still unclear as to the efficacy of this intervention and this report provides a comprehensive overview of available literature, and discusses the benefits and problems with the administration of PEP in certain circumstances. It also clearly re-emphasises that the most effective way to prevent transmission of HIV is to prevent exposure, and any programme of PEP administration should not replace primary prevention.

Auteur(s) : Blackham J, Almeda J

Année de publication : 2005

Pages : 68-9

En relation avec

Nos dernières actualités

actualité

Arboviroses en 2026 : les maladies transmises par les moustiques continuent...

actualité

Hantavirus Andes : mise en place des investigations épidémiologiques et du...

actualité

Prolongation de l’appel à candidatures pour le renouvellement du comité de...