Differences between new United States recommendations and existing European guidelines on the use of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) following non-occupational exposure
Last week the United States Department of Health and Human Services published updated recommendations for the use of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) following non-occupational exposure to HIV. The evidence is still unclear as to the efficacy of this intervention and this report provides a comprehensive overview of available literature, and discusses the benefits and problems with the administration of PEP in certain circumstances. It also clearly re-emphasises that the most effective way to prevent transmission of HIV is to prevent exposure, and any programme of PEP administration should not replace primary prevention.
Author(s): Blackham J, Almeda J
Publishing year: 2005
Pages: 68-9
In relation to
Our latest news
news
Arboviral Diseases in 2026: Mosquito-Borne Diseases Continue to Spread This...
news
Andes Hantavirus: Implementation of epidemiological investigations and...
news